Questioning the Official Narrative About the El Paso Walmart Shooting
There are a lot of holes in the official narrative about the El Paso Wal-Mart mass shooting. The violence was certainly real, and people were really shot and killed, but the official narrative surrounding the tragedy has a few holes. Here are some questions we should be asking ourselves about this shooting.
Why did so many eyewitnesses report multiple shooters at the scene?
There were many videos going around in the first hours of the shooting with witnesses claiming that they saw multiple shooters in the store. This could have been a symptom of the chaos of the situation, which might make you feel like you are being attack from all angles. Yet, many witnesses at many of these mass shootings (Aurora, Harvest, etc.) report multiple shooters. Nonetheless, when the police finish their reports, there is only a “lone gunman” left to blame. Also, many of the videos with these witnesses have been scrub from search engines in the last few days. Why?
Why did the local police arrest and hold three suspects in custody, as was widely reported by the media before the story was changed to a “lone shooter?”
It could be something as simple as covering all their tracks, but when you add the witness testimony that their was multiple gunman it makes you wonder who those other two suspects were. First thing that pops into my head is that they could be intelligence handlers, possibly foreign or domestic.
Why is the “manifesto” being reported as linked to the gunman when its has not actually been confirmed to be his? It pure speculation pushed by the media and dug up by some deep state actor. Other media critics are saying that it appears to be written by someone far older than 21 years of age. Is the manifesto angle a complete hoax, perhaps designed to stoke racial division in the United States?
How does one man kill 20 people and wound another 30 people with a single magazine that only holds 30 rounds? The surveillance photo shows no chest rig, no battle belt and no spare magazines.
If the shooter is on a suicide mission, why does he bother to wear both eye protection and ear protection? Perhaps he knows he will survive his “mission” and be taken into custody after surrendering to police. Or maybe he was drugged by his handlers and performed his role in a hypnotic state. In a year the world will have forgotten the name of the shooter, and the media will never report anything about him again.
Why was the shooter’s online profile changed from “Democrat” to Republican / Trump supporter / QAnon follower? Clearly the deep state is modifying his online profile to match their own conspiracy theories and official narratives about QAnon followers being “domestic terrorists.” This is feels like an Orwellian psyop but I’m willing to except this was simply both parties damage control teams getting in their and pushing the narrative in their direction.
In summary, the official narrative doesn’t add up. In fact, it feels like it’s all just a Shakespearean drama “staged violence” event which combines real violence with a fake narrative to achieve a specific political purpose. In this case, the goal is the disarmament of the American people, blaming Trump for everything and positioning illegals as “victims” of a mass shooting when, in reality, it was Americans who were actually shot.
If you ask yourself who benefits from this shooting then the answers should begin to flow to the forefront of your mind. It’s probably just some sad, depressed momma’s boy with a shitty dad who wanted to leave a mark in the most horrific of ways. Or it could be an example of the Deep State using the classic Hegelian Dialectic: create a problem, get a reaction, use a predetermined solution.